answer the questions, mr rudd

Having heard that EU president van Rumpoy had announced Copenhagen as being the first stage of a global governance, I set about writing this letter and taking it as soon as possible to Federal Member for Corio, Richard Marles's office on December 15.

I am in the process of sending the same letter to Alan Jones at 2GB, as he is the one whose interview with Lord Monckton I was alerted to recently.

The Government has questions to answer, as listed below, and I hope readers of this blog will do the same.

The local Geelong Advertiser has published a similar letter, which I am pleased, and surprised about.

I do not want some sshmick in Belgium dictating to me how my life is going to be, what taxes I have to pay, how I should run a business, etc, etc...

To allow this, and divest Australia of its sovereignty is outrageous.

Normally countries are subjugated by an outside force, not by a cancer from within.






Att:
The Right Honorable
The Prime Minister of Australia
Mr Kevin Rudd

cc.:

The Hon. Richard Marles
Federal Member for Corio

The Parliament of Commonwealth of Australia


From:

Gary S Oraniuk
Manifold Heights
GEELONG 3218


December 15, 2009


Mr. Marles,


It came to my attention yesterday that Mr. Herman van Rumpoy, the new head of the European Union, which is a main player in the Copenhagen climate talks, has announced that these talks are the first stage of a global government.

This being the case, I demand, on behalf of myself and every other natural being originating from Australia (i.e.: Australian citizens) a full and frank explanation of a number of things.

The Briton, Lord Monckton, a peer of the realm and member of the House of Lords, has disclosed, through research conducted by his colleagues, that embedded in the Copenhagen climate agreement is a clause binding signatories to a regime of global government.

Von Rumpoy’s statement confirms this.

Mr. Rudd is obliged-and I demand that he does so-to give the people of Australia a full and frank disclosure of his intentions, any foreknowledge of the “hidden agenda” Lord Monckton speaks of (world government)-and full disclosure of all events and discussions leading to the intention to sign the Copenhagen Treaty.

I also demand that Mr. Rudd returns to Australia immediately to fully inform the Australian people of the implications of signing such a treaty, and why he thinks he can speak for the whole nation when he has not informed the nation of his dubious intentions.

I also demand that Mr. Marles immediately returns to Geelong to face the public to explain your involvement and knowledge of the government’s intentions, and why you did not inform your constituents of any agenda to sign them up to Mr. van Rumpoy’s scheme.

Given that international treaties are separate and outside of the strictures of the Australian Constitution, signing of the Copenhagen Treaty would create an irreversible position for Australia, and you nor Mr. Rudd and his government have any right to do so.

I therefore demand that Federal Parliament be re-convened to consider a motion of no-confidence in the Rudd Labor Government.

As Ministers, your mandate is to represent your constituents, and on this issue in particular, you are remiss, and do not deserve the trust of your constituents. Your return, Messrs. Rudd and Marles, to fully brief your constituents and the electors of Australia and relay their wishes to the Parliament, is your main obligation to the aforementioned.

In the meantime, awaiting your return, I require a written answer to my queries and allegations immediately. My address is enclosed at the top of the letter.

The Federal Labor government may have a mandate to address climate change, but has no mandate from the people to divest the nation of its sovereignty or sign us up to a world government, and is possibly treasonous.

You will be held to account.




Gary S Oraniuk